View Single Post
Old Jun 1, 2007, 10:09 pm   #9 (permalink) (top)
Heather
Odd Girly Girl
 
Heather's Avatar
 
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 557
Quote:
Quote by: SoylentGreen View Post
The government can't be trusted to save for you its just not where there priority is.
There should be schemes where people can save for themselves.
Say 1 to 5% of your wages go into a bank saving scheme which is then topped up by an equal amount by your employer.
And the employer should pay this on a compulsory basis after all it is your life and energy that you are putting into making their business profitable.
And the government should also put into the savings through a tax break for those who choose to enter into the scheme.
That gives people an incentive to save and in the long run is a better way to spend the tax dollar.
It does have the problem though in that employers will say its a pay rise for the worker and those on low income will still find it difficult to save.
Roth IRA's are designed with something like what you've mentioned in mind. Employers do not contribute to it, however, every American citizen below X amount of income (I forgot the exact number) can have one. There are advantages as well with a Roth IRA to help these lower income people get on their feet, such as interest free home loans, borrowing against your initial contributions without penalty, etc.
Heather is offline   Reply With Quote