Quote:
Quote by: Chaossaber314  So once again, like so many other conspiracy theories, we're brought back to the absence of evidence being evidence of absence.
Frankly, I think the only nonsense in this regard are people with so much hatred for the administration that they can't believe that a strong majority went out to the polls and went "Jeez, I don't like George Bush but I'd rather have him than that John Kerry guy." (at least in 04)
Clearly now, that was a mistake, but it doesn't change the fact that many many people still voted for Bush. It's much like the Iraq War critics who pretend that there was always the current level of contempt with the war when public opinion polling clearly shows at least a majority of the country supported sending troops to Iraq in the beginning. |
I never said there was no evidence, I suggested that the evidence is not OBVIOUS. You have to dig for it, then you have to BELIEVE it.
Diabold is run by a friend of the Bush family. Florida's govornor is The president's brother. The majority of the country was for getting those responsible for the WTC attacks. Congress voted for the Iraq war due tofalsified information. Many now have recanted thier support in light of new evidence contradicting the old.
In effect, the Bush administration LIED to start a war, and even many Republican congressmen are upset about that.
I seem to recall much "hatred" for the Clinton administration, even though he didn't start any wars. All he did was have a PERSONAL relationship. Subtle difference.