| The problem with that definition, from an objective standpoint, is that you have to now define your definition.
It's like looking up a word in the dictionary and then having to look up the words in the definition.
What God calls himself is irrelevant.
"Everlasting" isn't a beginning and an end, it's the entire range, so how can he be "everlasting to everlasting?"
Author of all laws? So he's guiding the hand of the U.S. gov't now and the hand of Hitler in the 40's?
He created all matter and life? How?
He is Father? Or a Father? And do you mean biological? Spiritual? Can you define what a spirit is?
Objectively speaking, I'm with Lullaby and Isherwood.
If something can't be defined then it can't be argued conclusively by anyone, regardless of which side they are taking. |