Quote:
Quote by: saltinespike  Since this topic has not been active lately, and the fact that I was not able to be a part of it, I am bringing it back up.
The Death Penalty.
I think that it is quite justified and quite simple: you kill someone and we'll kill you back. We are justified because you (someone with the death penalty) were unjustified in what you did. Of course, this is not restricted to killing someone. It all depends on the situation.
But whenever you break the rules, you can always expect a punishment which leads back to "We are justified because you (someone with the death penalty) were unjustified in what you did."
What's your opinion? |
saltinespike as I've stated before in these forums I am wholeheartedly against the death penalty. Those who've commited and thoroughly proven of murder, which can be categorised as abhorent by the rest of society should not be put to death as retribution, justice or any other crazy word we use to ensure their crime is punished.
These diabolical creatures should be de-classified as humans and their bodies used for vivisection or other experiments in which science can learn more about disease and pain progress.
Thus my stance is the death penalty, is that it is a waste of a valid resource that will enable the rest of us humans to improve our world, whilst ridding the world of those who have no social consience. Yes I concur that keeping them could risk escape, but a suitable lobotomy should render them halmless :)