Thread: Global Warming
View Single Post
Old May 29, 2007, 05:58 am   #281 (permalink) (top)
Pooeypants
Neo Moderator
 
Pooeypants's Avatar
 
Location: England
Posts: 5,609
Quote:
Quote by: xyzer View Post
Pooey..direct quotes from your ref on the hockeystick..

I added the emphasis!
I'm suprised you imply centainty to this admittedly flawed study that has been used as a starting point about the cause of climate change?
Please don't quote out of context, you seem to omit the latter part;
Quote:
Climate scientists, however, are only too aware of the problems (see Climate myths: It was warmer during the Medieval period), and the uncertainties were both highlighted by Mann's original paper and by others at the time it was published.
However, I do apologise, I don't think I quite understood what you meant by
Quote:
I have also posted references by scientists who say that the 'hockey stick' graph was misaapplied because if ommitted the global warming data of the past, and thus accentuated the recent warming trend? It was statistically flawed!
Which data was been omitted?


War is Peace
Freedom is Slavery
Ignorance is strength
Harness the power of Ingsoc, then you can capture someone killed the year before
Pooeypants is offline   Reply With Quote