Quote:
Chris the Cheese said:
It seems highly unlikely that Cho would have been able to produce such a massive bomb and deploy it as successfuly.
|
Based on what?
Quote:
Chris the Cheese said:
It is far more likely that he would have been like the deranged neo-Nazi bomber David Copeland, who used multiple nail bombs but eventually killed only three people.
|
And again, based on what?
Quote:
Chris the Cheese said:
Based on this fact,
|
You haven't stated a fact yet.
Quote:
Chris the Cheese said:
is it not a reasonable conclusion that had Cho been unable to use the efficient tools that are guns and been forced to use the considerably more dangerous (to himself) and much less efficient tool that is the home made bomb, then it is doubtfull that he would have been anywhere near as prolific a killer as managed to be with guns?
|
Thats an absurd, illogically based conclusion, but what's new there?
Quote:
Chris the Cheese said:
In that case, should the FBI come across a home containing the materials to construct say a 'dirty bomb' then would you not have them confiscate them and try the owner under terrorism laws, because after all a dirty bomb is just an 'instrument'?
|
The average person has access with materials to make a bomb far worse than a dirty bomb. Dirty Bombs, if you are talking about nukes, are more scary than deadly when compared to alternatives, but I would expect you to chase the hype of "dirty bombs".... boogie woogie man comin to get everyone.....booo
No, It would be absurd Chris.
What material in particular?