Quote:
Rinoa said:
Again, generally only possible once the child is in school...Usually when I post about being a stay at home mom I am refering to the first six years or so.(kinderrgarden is four hours long, tops, you need to be able to drop off and pick up)
|
Generally I would tend to agree.
Quote:
Rinoa said:
I'm not sure how this part applied. Care to explain further?
|
Sure. Having children is an act between two people, resulting in a baby. The burden is theirs, and if their respective famillies wish to help that is all the better providing the parents are accepting.
Children, are not the societies burden to bear. Societies are built around adults, laws apply to adults, children are in the "grey area" and are charged to their parents for financial and social responsibility.
I am tired of hearing this lie about it taking a "village to raise a child" or that "communities should bear the burden of education for all children" via taxation I have no choice in.
If people didn't place so much value in competing with the Jones's for "status" or "to appear wealthier" most people wouldn't be in debt, and wouldn't need two jobs to raise a child.
To many adults don't understand economics or credit, and are too quick or lazy to shrug the burdens of their own cause on society via appeals to emotion and logical fallacies implemented in legislation by life-term seeking professional politicians, who speak whichever direction the wind is blowing where they stand, and work out of the pockets of special intrests and corporate lobbyists.
Whats the best way to destroy the idea of a wholesome, responsible, trust filled family unit?
Remove the penalty for shrugging responsibility by parents and children, and offset it on the community.