Quote:
Quote by: xyzer  Agree pooey! If we want to reduce pollution nuclear power is a safe efficient and cleaner way to produce energy. There are other alternatives that should be considered. Clean burning coal technology used to consume the vast amount of coal available in this country. Hydrogen technologyy should be developed. All it adds to the environment is water.
But thats to reduce pollution and I'm not convinced that CO2 is the prime agent in global warming? Even the two alleged myths you posted refute your claims of certainty about the reason for the latest warming.
From your sources..
Hmm? There are periodic changes.
In the long term our progeny face cooling?
Does this suggest that there is not any scientific certainty and as stated even so there was a clear consensus that future climate change could niot be predicted? |
The so called Global cooling was one idea that was entertained but by no means embraced by the scientific community like Global warming. Further more, the computational modelling and satellite data collection that is available NOW puts us in a much, much better position to make predictions.
But that isn't the point of my articles, they're there to point out of your repeated myths.