Thread: Global Warming
View Single Post
Old Apr 29, 2007, 05:59 pm   #182 (permalink) (top)
xyzer
Liberated thinker
 
xyzer's Avatar
 
Location: New Mexican Alps
Posts: 1,977
Quote:
You're assuming that because CO2 is in relatively low concentrations, it is insignificant in terms of thermal absorbance.
I would posit that as a logical assumption. When I consider the economic impacts of such efforts to reduce emissions which contribute some small fraction of less than 1% of the earths atmosphere, I shudder at the unreal logic involved.

I've repeatedly asked for, and I'm waiting for answers confirming certainty in your doomsday scenario posts.. You continually place implicit trust in studies that admittedly did not include all the factors in climate change and have used skewed and flawed facts upon which to draw uncertain conclusions. Conclusions using the words, "could, may, if".. IMO.pretty uncertain reasons to expend resources and reduce standards of living trying to conjure up improbable scientifically challenged actions?


Thus we play the fools with the time, and the spirits of the wise sit in the clouds and mock us.
xyzer is online now   Reply With Quote