Quote:
|
Sorry but take the gloves off and we could flatten ANYONE. That's not boasting, it's a fact. But that aside, you don't have to beat us militarily, you just have to "shock" the bleeding hearts in the States and we'll lose for you
|
.
Mr Vic; I think you are off base here. Much like the Viet Cong in Viet Nam, the US troops in Iraq, at times,can't tell the enemy from the allies. What would you have the US do, nuke all of Bagdad, Falusha, or the other Iraqi cities? Bomb them into submission. It couldn't be done in Viet Nam and it can't be done, without total annihilation of the entire country, in Iraq. Would you completely destroy the entire country of innocent people simply to destroy the terrorists? This can't be done and that is why the US will never prevail in Iraq. The US has no weapons that can tell foe from ally and that is the real reason the military can't prevail.
This has nothing to do with the "bleeding hearts" subterfuge that those in the US use as a strawdog to redirect the debate away from the reality of the situation in Iraq. Iraq is a continuous sandstorm in which, once again, the US troops are mired and never belonged in the first instance. This US occupation of Iraq is fruitless and continues to point to a non resolution of the insurgent conflicts there. Just how long would you have the US remain in Iraq? How long will it take to "get the job done", whatever that may be? Even the US generals have stated this is something that can only be solved by the Iraqis themselves. The US needs to close down this debacle a soon as possible. It is obvious to me, the power brokers in DC didn't learn lesson one in Viet Nam because if they had, we wouldn't be in Iraq.