| I hope you do not take this post as an attack, it is meant as a friendly offer of advise, as well as an observation on form.
You are defining your personal philosophy here as a negative. Therefore you not only give validity to your opposition by telling them you only exist because they do, but if you somehow achieve your ends and religion as you see it goes away what do you have left(?), since you define yourself by reference to them.
A philosophy that can stand the test of time must be able to stand on its own. It cannot be a hasty revision of another philosophy, nor can it be simply an expression of rebellion. You may want to review your beliefs and base a philosophy off of a solution, rather than a criticism.
Again, no offense intended, just an observation. |