Quote:
Quote by: jamesbdunn |
When Reagan effected the HAARP program (originally contracted to G.E. company ( whom he worked for before intering politics) a lot of concerned scientists presented reasons why the project would be dumped as potentially dangerous.
Once a technology is constructed that can be used also for military purposes then the cat is out of the bag, and soon anyone can take advantage of such technology for the wrong reasons.
Like nuclear energy for clean burning electric power, now we fear Iran can convert such technology for making bombs.
I do not think I would advocate the project you linked too because those in charge of our governments normally have little knowledge about the environment and putting them in charge of controlling the weather would seem to be "asking for it" ( as in the "negative" meaning ). Better off to let nature control the weather as it has done for millions of years and for us to take steps to remove our polutions that can hamper that natural process. Also polutions cause more problems then global warming alone, we have health issues concerning cancer and breathing problems.
HAARP Home Page HAARP.net - The Military's Pandora's Box by Dr. Nick Begich and Jeane Manning