ibeeberz...read this reference carefully...
http://....http://http://www.friends.../deFreitas.pdf
Based on the questionable reasons for the protocol in the first place I would suggest Canada only adhere to its targets if it does not adversely impact Canadas economy! It's more important to have optimum employment and economic wealth than it is to hang ones hat on a doom and gloom scenario that is based on faulty climate studies and even manufactured data(Hockey stick graph) A suggestion in the IPCC panel study is that even if humans could influence their industrial emissions, it would be two centuries for these changes have an effect on global climate.
The climate is actually cooler over the past 4 or 5 years.and there is all, kinds of evidence that it varies over the years. There is no definitive evidence that humans can, or are, affecting it either. It's conjectural to think that any changes humans make will affect the major sources of climate change..the suns variable intensity, tectonic shifting, volcanic activity and cosmic rays impacting our atmosophere. among other things.
Co2 is less than 1% of the earths atmospheric gasses and human contributions to it are some small fraction of that 1%. Is it prudent to believe changing a small fraction of 1% of the earths atmosphereic gases will caus climate change?