I have no doubt Paul doesn't support TAX based campaigns.
I never said he did.
That doesn't mean he isn't the least harmful canidate running to the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and the Liberty and equality of the individual.
I am one of few Libertarians who would view a tax based approach as reasonable, but I have my reasoning.
Some libs agree, some don't.
Paul is still hands down the least harmful canidate in the running for President, and that alone stands proven by his voting record compared to ANY of the others.
