| If we authorize taxation for representation, the only answer is for us to remove public/corporate PRIVATE financing of elections, and invoke a tax-dollar paid for election and campaign fund, with strict rules written in about doling that money to the canidates who meet "ballot requirements" equally, regardless of party.
It is IMPOSSIBLE for two parties to represent 300,000,000 people, in any measure that resembles NEAR adequate.
To claim any different is absurd.
We hold elections so the peoples voice can be heard, and their "campaigning" is only to get out their message to the people, and to DEBATE challengers.
The debates are a joke, and the two major parties do all they can in coercion with major media to ISOLATE the debates to only the two major parties, since they operate on the same playbook, and address only the same talking points, to which they can recite pre-written, regurgitated answers, and have NO valid questions presented by opponents who can competently challenge them. (since no third parties are allowed to debate, no fear of a challenge from the two "major party" canidates, who are owned lock stock and barrel by corporate lobbyists, and special intrests.)
Petition of Redress of Grievances:
http://www.givemeliberty.org/default.htm
Canadian Lawsuit Against Their National Banks:
http://www.freewebs.com/classaction/
Osborn F. Enready |