| I'm amused at your plaintiff 'nit pick' Pooey? You find one anomaly in a host of data and point it out? What about the accuracy and impact of the major portion of the data? I'd opine it's typical of the defenders of the current global warming hysteria? They blithely ignore lots of counter evidence and continue to generalize about human contributions to Co2?
You do a lot of verbal posturing about scientific inquiry and yet you imply certainty to the qualified opinions contained in the conclusions of certain scientific studies? And. amazingly either ignore or counter the accuracy of contra finding and opinions?
The levels of Co2 and humans contributions to it are there and minimal, and yet you defend those who amplify these levels or there importance?? There are all sorts of definitve sources which show it's less than 1% of the earths gases and yet you seem to agree changing a fraction of it will 'tip the scales' of global climate?
Thus we play the fools with the time, and the spirits of the wise sit in the clouds and mock us. |