Quote:
Quote by: Kamehameha34  I doubt you'll find an agnostic on the board who says otherwise. |
lawls, you. Remember that conversation we had? You're so afraid of having a belief you went from agnostic to unpracticing agnostic, to some other crap, and you still didn't fit.
This also isn't the place to debate what agnosticism is. Let's not continue my comment into a discussion, please.
Quote:
|
Quote by: Kamehamea34 1. Such as?
2. Is it logically valid evidence? (No ad ignorantium) |
You're asking for evidence against the existence of god?
Our world does not match up with the existence of a god who is described in the Bible.
The Bible itself is contradicting.
Injustice of absolute punishment and rewards.
Religion seems to be a huge part of human attempts to explain the world, hence the greek gods, and there is no reason to believe more recent religions have suddenly found the answer.
There is evidence against the existence of Jesus, and Jesus is fundamental to Christianity and the existence of God is only convincing if Christianity is true. Else, the Bible is a book of lies (more than we all already know) and should not taken seriously.
The sheer number of religions (over 200) is suspicious.
Many holy books are curiously similar to the particular region they were written. This includes many barbaric traditions and it is suspicious that a perfect god would have such disgusting morals.
The problem of evil and the contradicting qualities of God.
Our world is slowly being explained by intelligent people with state-of-the-art tools, resources, and equipment, and not once have these explanations been agreeably a god.
I could go on and on..
Please, please, please make sure you understand that
evidence is not the same as proof.