View Single Post
Old Mar 14, 2007, 05:02 am   #3804 (permalink) (top)
Elminister
Verbal dreadnaught
 
Elminister's Avatar
 
Location: N.Y
Posts: 91
Quote:
Quote by: Chris the Chees View Post
Yes. Do you actively choose to whom you are sexually attracted? Most, if not all people, are attracted instinctually not conciously; there is no decision making process in it on anything other than a sub-concious level.
No, I do not actively choose my thoughts. Everybody actively chooses to or to not manifest this attraction is my point. There is a decision being made there that you or anybody else cannot remove, no matter how hard you try.

In several different studies in sexual orientation conducted by different people at different times have produced this simular statement: there were far more people,in those studies, that professed to or showed a homosexual inclination/desire than what could actually be construed both by admission and definiton to represent the percent of the homosexual demography as it exists in society.

Tell me, honestly, what does that above fact mean to you? Is that not indicative of a choice, all the way around the table? Show me a different interpretation of that if you can.



Quote:
Quote by: Chris the Chees View Post
You equate attraction with 'random' thought?
Hmmm, are your random encounters planned? Wouldn't an attraction forged in a random encounter with a woman indeed be a roving thought? Or are you saying that you could be attracted to every and all women on this planet because you carry a base attraction to women? Preference is still at play and preference is manifest by choice.



Quote:
Quote by: Chris the Chees View Post
Then how do you explian that homosexuality has existed throughout human existance and across the rest of animal kingdom?
It's an anomaly continued on thru and by consciousness of actions. There is no proof to show it being passed on in the genome. How simple, huh.



Quote:
Quote by: Chris the Chees View Post
And thus we get to the crux of the anti-gay argument; some judgmental meanderings into the subjective while operating under the pretence that the judgements are objective and thus subject to the two dimensional paradigm of ‘right and wrong’.
The 'paradigm' is all that is needed for one to make a decision for and that only affects ones self, unless of course you think more than that is needed.
This is the logic quo that homosexuals use in regarding their own decisions of personal lifestyle..."Who is it hurting?" Of which however ,with somebody else in this forum, I am expanding on how it is probable to "hurt" somebody.

Quote:
Quote by: Chris the Chees View Post
Personal insults and ad-hominems are not tolerated here Elminister. I advise you to watch your tone.
This is a warning from a Volconvo Moderator, correct? As I have read in the forum rules is this not supposed to be deliverd via the P.M system only?
If I am mistaken then offer up the correct explanation if you would/should because I'm going to look into this further myself for an accurate explanation.

Quote:
Quote by: Volconvo's Rules
Moderation issues must be address via PM or in the Site Operations forum
http://www.volconvo.com/forums/socie...uncements.html

Your up next, Bacon Guy.


"Darkness!...gather to me! Yield unto me the unbridled fury of chaos!...... Gift unto me the indomitable power of rage!".........
..................... and cookies and milk if ya got em':)
Elminister is offline   Reply With Quote