| I am posting under the assumption that those participating are informed people that actually read before they post a reply. I would appreciate being given that in return, but of course, I have no way to enforce that other than refusing that benefit of the doubt to those that do not reply in kind.
I happen to be well versed with English, my mother tongue and only unless I can count computer languages or languages I have the vocabulary of a tabloid. So, yes, I was aware that the hook was an analogy. But you left nothing else open to comment on, so what exactly did you expect?
As far as that goes what mode are we debating this subject in? Logos, pathos, ethos, or free-for-all? You know, logic/reason, emotional, or appeal to authority/tradition... |