one thing i don't like is that the tittle 'pro-life' makes the position seem the more 'morally correct one' when it really isn't that definite of a thing. when calling them anti-choice....seems somewhat negative...but not inaccurate.
do agree with Shawmutt :)
this whole argument depends so much on individual situations.
which to me makes this seem like the appropriate time to re-instate my position that its a choice of the people who are directly involved....and that means that the mother and the father (who can both actually have a SAY as in speak)
one thing i don't agree with is people critising girls for falling pregnanut and wanting an abortion when still studying or still very young. and therefore having there life to deal with...people who say they were foolish enough. when those same people will admit that the age of experimentation and easy to manipulate can really affect supposed common sense. and all this time were the hell is the dayum male at
he CAN and often does do a runner.
do we want to sacrifice a person here and now (who later on in life can produce another child) and led them to a poor life and poor life for the child.
do we concern ourselves with and linger over the importance of every birth happening...and then not care about the rest of that child's life or the life of her mother or father?
do we stop safe medical procedures in favour of natural abortions that the mother can and will perform if she is led to via starvation etc etc.
Do we abolish choice in the matter and leave many people resentfull because beliefs have been forced upon them?
Do we stop the safe medical practises in favour of bringing back the old 'back-alley abortions'?
to me it just seems the best way to deal with this is to keep the choice..
...if you think it's wrong if you don't like it....between you and your partner...don't do it don't abort.....but allow others to choose...if the choice no longer stands the conseqences are going to be far far far far worse