[LetThereBe]

Quote by: pikatore I've found an analogy which more or less sums up what I've been trying to tell theists who believe that the burden of proof should not be placed on them: Russell's teapot - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Comments?

There exists a fundamental difference between Russell's Teapot and a supernatural deity.

The teapot is subject to statements of probability.

However, I do agree that the burden of proof lies with he who asserts.