Quote:
Quote by: Kamehameha34  You've yet to prove that your comparison is any more than appeal to ridicule.
Basically, you're taking russel's teapot, saying "isn't this ridiculous?" and then connecting it with the god claim, through only the fact that both claims are unfalsifiable. |
It refutes the idea that the burden of proof lies upon the sceptic to disprove unfalsifiable claims of religions.
It demonstrates how that idea is an argumentum ad ignorantiam.
It doesn't claim anything to be untrue simply because it is ridiculous. Stop claiming logical fallacies until you properly understand what they mean.