| </span><blockquote><span class="smallfont">Quote:</span><hr size="1" />Originally Posted by (Agnes Ostic,)
I am not advocating it, the world would be a better place if it were not necessary. I am merely defending that the world is not good enough a place for it to be unnecessary.<hr size="1" /></blockquote><span class='postcolor'> Only a very small number of abortions are necessary to save a woman's life ... the principle of self-defense is the supreme reason to base a woman's choice to terminate a pregnancy, but even that choice ought not carry with it the automatic 'right to a dead baby'; that our current laws grant that specious 'right to a dead baby' is our nations shame and that shame has many parameters we might address in this debate, sucvh as aid to pregnant women without the stigma, welcoming the new individual and embracing the woman who has given (that's right, given, not forced) life support to a fellow individual human being.
What you've offered as the reasons to kill other alive individual human beings fall far short of necessary, and a society that will take the serial killing route for the convenience and expedience of it falls far short of the founding principles and traditional founding values of America. So far you've offered not one legitimate reason to kill fellow innocent human beings. |