Quote:
Originally posted by white rice,
Because he clouds his moral views with business and political interests. It makes him just as bad as Imp's description of the left and according to him, how they sometimes cammoflage their cause in PC.
Examples, he supports in vitro fertilization (which destroys embryos) but opposes stem cell research (which destroys embryos). He believes strongly in the word of the Bible, but supports the Death Penalty even for reformed born-again Christian criminals who would be considered innocent in the New Testament.
He originally opposed nation building, but cites 9/11 and God as the reason he's in Iraq. Instead of sending officials experienced in building nations in Kosovo, Afghanistan, and East Timor, his administration sent GOP shills who are more concerned about politics than doing their job right. http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/...12.whoswho.html |
You are confusing your liberal views with Bush's religious ones. Whatever you believe in that he doesn't, you find fault with and vice versa. I thought the lead post could result in an interesting discussion but then liberals bring politics into it.
So in that regard let me make a further analysis. (Mia this is my opinion, ok?)!
Liberals in general are against religion in general. It's not surprising that they would not be able to differentiate between Bush's moral values and his religious beliefs. Because liberals don't believe in capital punishment but most conservatives do, they find this odd? How so? Liberals don't mind murdering unborn babies, do they? And unborn babies have never committed a crime against anyone but their selfish mothers who don't want to bother with them. An adult who commits murder deserves to lose his life because of it. There is no incongruity there at all except the lopsidedness of the liberals morals, such as they are.