Quote:
Blef said:
It's good the killer was apprehended.
I don't have a problem with surveillance cameras, in general. I have them on my property. I think all owners of property have a right to use such means to monitor their property for whatever reason they choose.
What I find disagreeable is government having cameras or other means of surveillance and using such means to monitor, track, or record people, or being able to subpoena property owners to turn over their footage. In my view, government is not legitimate and cannot own any property, or lay claim to unowned property.
|
I agree.
My opposition to surveillance cameras is police, government run surveillance of public spaces.
I have no problem with individual choice to use it to monitor YOUR land. I would have a problem obviously if another individual had their surveillance cameras largely encompassing my land, without my express permission to do so.