Can't be bothered reading the rest of this thread but I'll take this one step further:
Quote:
Quote by: Zhavric
Wow. I'm honestly impressed.
I'd re-word those slightly:
1) There is no evidence god exists and considerable evidence suggesting no god(s) exist.
2) There is no evidence anything beyond the physical universe exists.
3) Asserting god is the origin of life on Earth is "god of the gaps" reasoning and is not supported by evidence.
|
'Evidence' is a human concept deducted by the currently discovered elements. No human being can possibly know everything or is without fault therefore by any scientists deduction it is more than likely if not certain that the so called evidence is also faulty and/or tainted. It is also drawn from a scientific standpoint that partnered with the knowledge that everything is dependant on the currently known environment (which is not the same as the future environment) that evidence/lack of evidence is completely irrelevent. All it truly tells us is that in the current environment we have discovered some elements and not discovered others.