| It seems we have two debates going on here -- Is there a God and which is correct creationism or evolution. As to the first, it can and has been proven. Plato and Aristotle arrived, purely by irrefutable logic, there had to be a "prime mover." When I was eleven, I asked my mother where God came from. She replied that he had parents and one was named Titus. I then asked where Titus came from. She replied, "Get out of here and go play." Ten minutes later while sitting on my front porch, I logically came to the same conclusion. If A came from B, where did B come from? How many iterations of this exercixe does one have to go through before one realizes someone or something always existed. There is no other conclusion. An Eternal being logically and irrefutably proven. From that being all else sprang. Now that we know what happened, all we have to do is give the eternal being a name. I call Him God.
Evolutionists beg the question. They want to begin in the middle of history. As preiviously stated here, they want to postulate how certain elements came together under certain conditions and presto, life sprang forth. Maybe, but where did the elements come from? Following the same logical thought process as I previously set forth, you can only come to one conclusion, from the eternal being. Whether you want to say that He made certain elements and created just the right circumstances to create life, or that He created all from the dust of the earth, you cannot logically deny it came from Him. |