Quote:
Quote by: Epistemologist  I'm just cautiously mentioning a general problem with many of these studies so people who believe whatever they're told will think twice the next time they hear something. What's your problem? :rolleyes: |
I'm just sick of people who think they know more than an entire organisation dedicated to studying weather and climate, or science on a whole for that matter. I'm all for doubting, it's what science is all about, without it there is no progress but the criticism must be founded on good reasoning. All I see are layman's making a few points about "variables not accounted for blah blah", yet without any specifics. Why? Because a lot of them just don't know, they just read on sites that gave anecdotal evidence yet they still take that over peer reviewed published papers.