| Sorry, some misunderstanding (my fualt) here. I mean, just providing the bible as evidence shouldn't be permissable. I wasn't trying to "bash" the bible, merely stating that I believe that it should be used as a factual source. Dannyp, I didn't mean to offend you, but thank you for posting about nothing changes if you don't do something.
On if homosexuality is a sin, first you must define sin. I was just trying to understand were your coming from. Here's were I'm coming from:
1. Homosexuality is a natural sexual behavior, that some are attracted to men, and others aren't
2. Homosexuality is not a sin (a crime, or wrongdoing to yourself, or others)
a. I thought that the bilble advocated equal rights among all (correct me if I'm wrong) If it then spoke out against homosexual behavior, that would be very contridictory. This is percisely why I don't believe the bible should be used as a main point. It is left open to, in my opinion, to much interpretation.
3. Many families grow up with just a mother, or just a father. This proves that an "abnormal family" (by societies standards) can function properly
Sorry for the confusion
Shalom |