[shunyadragon]

Originally posted by PhanthomOps, Shunyadragon: Quote: "Considering some of the statements you have made before concerning evolution it is not clear what you consider proven. Since science is so interconnected selecting what you consider proven based on religious conviction and not the matter of fact of science can considered selective and problematic." I don't remember ever mentioning anything that would lead one to feel that I accept "evolution". I don't !!!!!!!!!

Read my post clearly. You mentioned that you accepted what science proved, therefore, because of the interconnectiveness of all science it made it unclear how you viewed evolution.

I personnaly feel that science is the human study and revalation of God's creation. The fact that science proves another one of God's handiwork, does not in my opinion prove to be selective or problematic.

What does science prove concerning God's handiwork? The interconnectiveness of all sciences makes selective acceptance based on religious prference inconsistent.

Elijah: Quote: "God created what science studies, science did not create god." and "Therefore, God is more responsible for us than science." I agree!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :) :)

Of course, science did not create God. Science never claimed to. I agree that God is more responsible, but since the Bible does not refer to itself as the literal word of God and it widely contradicts itself and is inconsistent with history it cannot be relied on as a literal account of how God created existece.