Quote:
Quote by: kubedawg  So do garbage pickers. What's your point? |
You previously said:
Quote:
|
Quote by: Kubedawg Quote by: kubedawg
This is why we need to develop better treatment of the animals before they are killed. In fact, I know someone who works at a slaughterhouse and I've been there, and seen the process, and it's not at all how you described. Only a few are like how you described, at least all except poultry. ... What I see in those videos is propaganda for the most part. |
Why is the turnover rate so high if the conditions are not so bad?
Garbage pickers turnover rates are no where near 90%. Just browsing the web, I am seeing rates of around 30% for garbage workers. A 60% difference is quite large.
Quote:
|
I'm not sure what AWist is please elaborate.
|
It stands for Animal Welfarist. ARist stands for Animal Rightist. The two are quite different.
Quote:
|
... testimonials are strong support when supporting or not supporting a cause.
|
Testimonials in debate are not verifiable -- particularly in debate form where the identities and histories of the participants cannot be verrified, as is the case here in these anonymous forums. We can all invent testimonials that counter the others and in geometry, where things balance out on each side of the equation neither is given extra weight to tip the scales. They cancel each other out. Why don`t you see this?
Captain Chaos, could you take a second to point out to Kubedawg the nil value of testimonials in anonymous debate format styles. I haven`t seen you resort to them, so I am guessing you, too, see they are nil in worth for debate.
Quote:
|
I just did in my previous post. Not my fault if you can't muster enough intelligence to see it.
|
Sorry, you did not. Please quote the passage where I appeal to ignorance. That would require you to find me saying we must consider something equally that we don`t know about with the science or facts that we do know about. Show us where I have posited such.
Quote:
|
So I debate on possibility, rather than probability? WTH is wrong with that? What is your point?
|
Discussions on possibilities is more akin to musing -- not debating on the facts of the issues.
So, are you admitting you are not debating on facts? It is well understood that facts are essential to debate, and where they are not certain, the highest probability is then referred to.