[gallo]

Quote by: Technosoul You cannnot even follow the rules concerning debate procedures which so states that calling a person stupid is "not the right way" to debate a topic.

I never called you stupid. Stop lying.

Quote by: Technosoul Saying that a person speaks from ignorance is not debating, saying that someone "most likely" is stupid is not an exception.

I guess you are ignorant of the fact that the word "ignorant" doesn't mean "stupid." I never said that you were "most likely" stupid. Stop lying.

Quote by: Technosoul Now when medical science first offered treatments for cancer they did not submit long term testing for those procedures (for peer review).

Yes they did. Besides the initial testing on animals (followed by papers submitted to peer review), long and expensive clinical trials were done (followed by papers submitted to peer review and the FDA). You don't know much about anything having to do with science, do you?

Quote by: Technosoul The radeation and/or operations used were done (still being done) without proof that they are effective (relative to testing done in a lab) although years of later experience demonstrated that their theory use useful "somewhat" for the purposes intended.

Did you mean "radiation"? No matter. You babble nonsense.

Quote by: Technosoul Nowadays many scientists are turning to science fiction writing so they can have more freedom to present their ideas without such peer reviews. They create a fictional storyline to go along with their scientific theory - which they do not have to proove because the book is classified as science fiction. Soon the theory becomes popular and everyone jumps in to try to proove it is right or wrong, which is normally impossible relative to currrent technology or the fact most of the universe is outside of our reach (for real time samples).

Another of your fantasies. It is pure nonsense. Many scientists aren't writing science fiction to present their ideas. The present their science in peer reviewed papers after thorough testing. By the way, there is only 1 'o' in prove and 2 'r' in current.

Quote by: Technosoul Example: I created a prediction for a newspaper headline which will read "Moon Mushroom found in outerspace by scientific probe". The fact that a mushroom could be proof of life on another planet or moon (where water is underground or where it is damp) can be tested. During the three mile island incident they noticed that mushrooms grew well in a radeoactive environment.

Meaningful how? What does that have to do with your fantasy about space mushrooms? What kind of mushrooms were you eating when you dreamed that up? Did you mean "radioactive"?

Quote by: Technosoul You can test it out your self with your own x-ray machine. The pores of a mushroom are microscopic enough that they could journey on cosmic drifts from planet to planet in the universe. Or attached to cosmic dust. Also the DNA of a mushroom is totally alien to any other life form on earth and cannot be linked to any matches on a evolutionary chart with other life forms.

BWAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHA. That's rich. Did you mean "spores"? Actually, the DNA of in mushrooms is exactly like the DNA in other organisms - the same nucleic acids arranged in the same way. And the genetic code is the same as used by all living things.

Quote by: Technosoul You can also test this theory by consuming some of the "mind alternating" mushrooms which contain postcard images of those "other" landscapes which might be located on distant planets in the universe, or located "beyond" this universe in those located on the other side of a wormhole or other kind of portal. So how about that? Go ask Alice.

Absolute blithering nonsense. How is eating a mushroom going to test your fantasy?

Quote by: Technosoul [snip of meaningless tripe]

Quote by: Technosoul Physics would not be a proper method for ceating proof about this. But you can do your own DNA testing on mushrooms to confirm that part of the theory.

Not only isn't it a theory, its wrong.

Quote by: Technosoul And you can got to the bottom of the ocean were volcanos erupt to find out if life forms can adopt to harsh environments that are normally not suited to other life forms on earth.

So what? Who ever claimed that organisms could not adapt to harsh environments?

Quote by: Technosoul Before testing make sure you have the proper permits to own or use a x-ray machine.

babble babble

Quote by: Technosoul Make sure you are in a country or location where consuming mind alternating mushrooms is lawful. And make sure you research the one used so that you are fully informed about what side-effects to expect. And do not jump out of any windows.

No doubt you speak from experience.

Quote by: Technosoul PS - the testing was already done and obtainable to the public if you know how to research for those facts.

BWAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHA. They weren't testing your delusions.

Quote by: Technosoul So - you got a prediction. You got the testing. and you got the hypothesis for the potential theory. (hypospace hypothesis). Should we publish that in the highschool textbooks?

So you don't understand what it means in science when one speaks about "publishing" a scientific paper either. I thought not. You don't seem to know much of anything having to do with reality. You actually think that your hallucination has something to do with science? Don't you understand that the prediction must be based on the hypothesis, i.e., it must predict conditions that must necessarily be true if the hypothesis is correct. And don't you understand that the experiment must have the ability to show the prediction wrong.

You're really funny.