Volconvo Debate Forums - View Single Post

Young · May 8, 2004, 09:42 am

In my local paper this morning a fellow Republican was calling democrats non support of Bush during War...Treason. I know that this is an election year, during Wartime, but for one side to accuse the other of Treason in May...that's a touch early. Democrats say Move on, Republicans coined the phrase "Moving forward". Democrats say "7 trillion dollar debt" , Republicans say "Clinton signed us up for Nafta". Dems say "where's the WMD" , Reps say "Moveon.org retoric". Dems think "Bush is responsible for 9/11" and Reps say "Kerry campaign propaganda". The Nation is split right down the middle, and no one is saying that these two Men are Frat brothers. Bush was Awol, Kerry didn't throw his medals...do ribbons count? Bush is a Bin Laden capture away from not having to worry about Kerry. Kerry is a Nader pre-election exit away from not having to worry about Bush. Americans are forced to choose, Bush - 2000 election, long vacation, 9/11, Christian values marching to War, WMD Lie, shady Business deals, Enron, Cheney n Haliburton, Rummi neglecting to curve prison conditions, Ashecroft & Wolfowitz blaming a wall, America hated throughout the World, and Major Job Loss.
Kerry - Most Liberal ever, pro gay rights, Jewish Bonesmen, shunned Catholic, Medals or ribbons, rich wife, flipper flopper, botox, baby killin, voted for it before i voted against it, mouthpiece Teddy K's best buddy, admitted to War crimes, gonna raise your Gas tax, doesn't support our troops...did i say most Liberal ever.

It would be hard to find Men who were more capable than these two at making the hatred boil from the opposite sides of the aisle.

If the Democrat primaries weren't fixed, then that means the Democrats are dumber than Bush. All they had to do was pick a candidate that had crossover potential, with the least amount of attackable positions...and Bush would of been Gone. Edwards could of grilled Bush in any Debate and the only thing he was attackable on was him being a Lawyer. Kerry is a Lawyer too. Would they of attacked him for coming from nothing to having money (American dream) as easily as they can say that Kerry married into money?

I'm tired of it all, I'm done, finished, finito...Nader can't win even though he's the only one saying bring the troops home. Voting for either Kerry or Bush would be a horrible waste of gas spent driving to and from the Poll.

Some of You might not get the reason why this Republican is angry, but the reason is because i'm well informed. If your not in daily contact with a 30 year military veteran that has supreme security clearance, then you should be reading what i write. To help you, i strongly suggest you read te following site, www.wanttoknow.info each statement is backed up by a major media source. Then go to google and type in "bush kerry skulls" this will bring up many sites, one of these sites has a list of Yale Bonesmen, which includes Bush 41 & 43, Cheney, & Yes Kerry. So you need to stop thinking in terms of Party Wars, and start asking yourself 3 questions which are more important than any others.

1 - Does America get involved in any War, without 9/11?

2 - Why are Your only serious choices for President both members of a super secret Fraternity that answers to a group of Brits namely the Builderburgers?

3 - If You Run the Carlyle group (Major defense investor) and Your son is President taking the Country into two Wars that You his father profit greatly from...could it be possible that in order to make this obscene amount of money, that you'd use your CIA contacts (Bush 41 was former CIA head) and pull whatever strings possible in order to get elected, then wouldn't you have to allow 9/11 so that the two Wars would then be possible, You'd have to surround yourself with people who would also be "On the Take" in order to keep what you were doing secret, you'd need Bin Laden in Afghanistan, You'd need uneducated Americans who thought you were here to protect them, You'd not want any 9/11 inquiry, You'd not wanna testify Publically or under oath, and you'd want the current head of the CIA to be a close personal friend of the family...atleast if you meant to get away with it, right?

Young

May 8, 2004, 09:42 am	#1 (permalink) (top)
Young Hot Lava Location: western NC Posts: 1,088	In my local paper this morning a fellow Republican was calling democrats non support of Bush during War...Treason. I know that this is an election year, during Wartime, but for one side to accuse the other of Treason in May...that's a touch early. Democrats say Move on, Republicans coined the phrase "Moving forward". Democrats say "7 trillion dollar debt" , Republicans say "Clinton signed us up for Nafta". Dems say "where's the WMD" , Reps say "Moveon.org retoric". Dems think "Bush is responsible for 9/11" and Reps say "Kerry campaign propaganda". The Nation is split right down the middle, and no one is saying that these two Men are Frat brothers. Bush was Awol, Kerry didn't throw his medals...do ribbons count? Bush is a Bin Laden capture away from not having to worry about Kerry. Kerry is a Nader pre-election exit away from not having to worry about Bush. Americans are forced to choose, Bush - 2000 election, long vacation, 9/11, Christian values marching to War, WMD Lie, shady Business deals, Enron, Cheney n Haliburton, Rummi neglecting to curve prison conditions, Ashecroft & Wolfowitz blaming a wall, America hated throughout the World, and Major Job Loss. Kerry - Most Liberal ever, pro gay rights, Jewish Bonesmen, shunned Catholic, Medals or ribbons, rich wife, flipper flopper, botox, baby killin, voted for it before i voted against it, mouthpiece Teddy K's best buddy, admitted to War crimes, gonna raise your Gas tax, doesn't support our troops...did i say most Liberal ever. It would be hard to find Men who were more capable than these two at making the hatred boil from the opposite sides of the aisle. If the Democrat primaries weren't fixed, then that means the Democrats are dumber than Bush. All they had to do was pick a candidate that had crossover potential, with the least amount of attackable positions...and Bush would of been Gone. Edwards could of grilled Bush in any Debate and the only thing he was attackable on was him being a Lawyer. Kerry is a Lawyer too. Would they of attacked him for coming from nothing to having money (American dream) as easily as they can say that Kerry married into money? I'm tired of it all, I'm done, finished, finito...Nader can't win even though he's the only one saying bring the troops home. Voting for either Kerry or Bush would be a horrible waste of gas spent driving to and from the Poll. Some of You might not get the reason why this Republican is angry, but the reason is because i'm well informed. If your not in daily contact with a 30 year military veteran that has supreme security clearance, then you should be reading what i write. To help you, i strongly suggest you read te following site, www.wanttoknow.info each statement is backed up by a major media source. Then go to google and type in "bush kerry skulls" this will bring up many sites, one of these sites has a list of Yale Bonesmen, which includes Bush 41 & 43, Cheney, & Yes Kerry. So you need to stop thinking in terms of Party Wars, and start asking yourself 3 questions which are more important than any others. 1 - Does America get involved in any War, without 9/11? 2 - Why are Your only serious choices for President both members of a super secret Fraternity that answers to a group of Brits namely the Builderburgers? 3 - If You Run the Carlyle group (Major defense investor) and Your son is President taking the Country into two Wars that You his father profit greatly from...could it be possible that in order to make this obscene amount of money, that you'd use your CIA contacts (Bush 41 was former CIA head) and pull whatever strings possible in order to get elected, then wouldn't you have to allow 9/11 so that the two Wars would then be possible, You'd have to surround yourself with people who would also be "On the Take" in order to keep what you were doing secret, you'd need Bin Laden in Afghanistan, You'd need uneducated Americans who thought you were here to protect them, You'd not want any 9/11 inquiry, You'd not wanna testify Publically or under oath, and you'd want the current head of the CIA to be a close personal friend of the family...atleast if you meant to get away with it, right? Young Young I guess all we've got Left......are these darned "Internets"