View Single Post
Old May 7, 2004, 10:19 pm   #83 (permalink) (top)
Milton Bradley
BANNED
 
Location: Ohio Province, Rep. of Comerica
Posts: 7,320
I've heard some compelling arguments against the landing I didn't see covered here.


1) The Rediation belt around the Earth. If anybody can explain why lead is needed to protect us from radiatoin on Earth, but noot in space. Are you saying Thinsulite (what NASA claims to have used) is still not available to the public, if it ever did exist?

2) How could air conditioning work in a vacume? Air conditioning requires heat to be transferred from one medium to another. (air to air, air to water, air to ?)

The story of the rotating space module works fine for the time when travelling to the Moon, but what about when they get there? They could not rotate the Lander when it was on the surface of the moon, so how did they cool it?


I think I would be willing to buy the whole story if I could those two points addressed to my saticfaction. Art Bell had open phone lines for any physisist that was willing to explain it to us dummies, but to date, no person has ever been able to explain air conditioning in space (or vacume).
Milton Bradley is offline   Reply With Quote