Volconvo Debate Forums - View Single Post

Technosoul · Dec 8, 2006, 11:35 am

So far I like the idea as presented within it's limited space of data.

We know that space is not a void of nothingness - on earth space contains air. And space contains energy that might be inactive. But space in theory is the distance between detectable objects - so one would need to determine if space is really space if it is not nothingness or just the distance between what we can see as an object due to the ability of the substance to reflect the light issued by the sun.

Also one would need a brief outline of why space expands and contracts. Science is now reporting that space is expanding as solar systems move away from each other but not from a center point for expanding.

Gravity as it is normally understood could pull things together which would reduce space between solar systems or whatever. If space is expanding between those planets in the universe then are we talking about some other factor - a kind of "anti-gravity" factor at work?

If space is expanding within the universe where is it coming from, what is producing more space as time progresses?

I was thinking about that puzzle and it occured to me that space might be composed of "information" that cannot vanish once a new idea comes into exsistance. That thoughts cause the balooning of space because that data must be stored somehow - such that memory creates space which can expand the totality of the universe as time progresses. As memory creates "the past" timewise - relative to now or relative to the future.

All those people thinking as well as animals over millions of generations would create a lot of "memory" data that would not be detectable as a substance other then within the concept of "space".

Of course it would be foolish to think that the space in the universe could expand just because people here on earth come up with new ideas or as animals come up with new ways to evolve which ideas would also be "information" that came into exsistance in this dimensional reality (from who knows where?).

So one would need to add the ideas related by Peter Russell in his book about the Global Brain. That planets are surrounded with memory banks which contain information that is added too for evolutionary purposes or to maintain a continued status of repeatable principles.

In effect he was suggesting that planets generate a type of consciousness - a field of information from which the next generation can draw from as a source of "construction instruction". Simular to genes or DNA strands of "tiny beads" as realted in the anology. As knowledge expands then so does the invisable storage "space" for that evolving data.

So would any of these comments add or subtract from the theory you presented?

Dec 8, 2006, 11:35 am	#3 (permalink) (top)
Technosoul Volcanic Erupter Posts: 8,663	So far I like the idea as presented within it's limited space of data. We know that space is not a void of nothingness - on earth space contains air. And space contains energy that might be inactive. But space in theory is the distance between detectable objects - so one would need to determine if space is really space if it is not nothingness or just the distance between what we can see as an object due to the ability of the substance to reflect the light issued by the sun. Also one would need a brief outline of why space expands and contracts. Science is now reporting that space is expanding as solar systems move away from each other but not from a center point for expanding. Gravity as it is normally understood could pull things together which would reduce space between solar systems or whatever. If space is expanding between those planets in the universe then are we talking about some other factor - a kind of "anti-gravity" factor at work? If space is expanding within the universe where is it coming from, what is producing more space as time progresses? I was thinking about that puzzle and it occured to me that space might be composed of "information" that cannot vanish once a new idea comes into exsistance. That thoughts cause the balooning of space because that data must be stored somehow - such that memory creates space which can expand the totality of the universe as time progresses. As memory creates "the past" timewise - relative to now or relative to the future. All those people thinking as well as animals over millions of generations would create a lot of "memory" data that would not be detectable as a substance other then within the concept of "space". Of course it would be foolish to think that the space in the universe could expand just because people here on earth come up with new ideas or as animals come up with new ways to evolve which ideas would also be "information" that came into exsistance in this dimensional reality (from who knows where?). So one would need to add the ideas related by Peter Russell in his book about the Global Brain. That planets are surrounded with memory banks which contain information that is added too for evolutionary purposes or to maintain a continued status of repeatable principles. In effect he was suggesting that planets generate a type of consciousness - a field of information from which the next generation can draw from as a source of "construction instruction". Simular to genes or DNA strands of "tiny beads" as realted in the anology. As knowledge expands then so does the invisable storage "space" for that evolving data. So would any of these comments add or subtract from the theory you presented?