[gallo]

Quote by: Technosoul I already know about pseudoscience and have already stated that I am not a scientist and do not claim otherwise.

No need to explain, really. That you are not a scientist is quite apparent.

Quote by: Technosoul As a science teacher you might be aware that Steven Hawking is having a problem with his theory about the black hole consuming everything, due to the paradox as outlined at this webpage.... (see bottom of page).

I had to look at the web site to find out what you were talking about. Did you actually read your own link? It's old news. By the way, Stephen Hawking (it would be nice if you at least spelled the man's name correctly if you are going to talk about him) doesn't have a theory about "the black hole comsuming everything." You left off an important qualification - "...that falls into it." And, as the link says, Hawking thinks that he has solved his problem that he has had since he developed his theory about black hole radiation (known as Hawking radiation). I think that maybe you didn't understand what you read.

Quote by: Technosoul A Turtle. As a former science teacher you should know a typo when you see one and be able to make the apparent correction in spelling with your brain power.

OH!!!! A turtle! Well, your whole analogy was so senseless I just couldn't figure out what you were talking about. Know that I know you were talking about a turtle, it makes even less sense.

Quote by: Technosoul You keep saying "read a book and learn" and yadda da da, A new theory is not a repeat of fomer theories. You cannot read about a new idea in an old book.

But if you had made any effort to learn the basics of what you are trying to discuss, you would know that new theories are extensions of old ones. If you don't understand the basics and the history, then you are liable to spout nonsense. Also, if you actually had read a book or two on cosmology and astrophysics (and understood them - I also see a problem with your reading comprehension) you would be aware that you are babbling nonsense.

Quote by: Technosoul You are like those people who read the Bible and thought the earth was flat because everyone said so, you think the guy on the Mayflower is "crazy" or poorly educated.

Because I think that you are talking nonsense? What does any of that have to do with your misunderstanding of some 6th grade science?

Quote by: Technosoul You laugh at the new idea because it would mean that all that stuff you learned is no longer right.

No, I laugh at your idea because it is absolute nonsense.

Quote by: Technosoul Times they are a-changin'. Well, the earth is not flat and the universe is not flat and you will not fall off the "edge of the universe" into a Black Hole like they did in that Star Trek movie. That is if my theoretical explaination is correct once all the peer reviews and testing is completed.

Your "theoretical explanation" is neither "theoretical" nor an "explaination" [sic]. It is wild fantasy at best and isn't likely to undergo any peer review. Do you even know what peer review is?

Quote by: Technosoul Next you will be telling me that someone went out to the sun and collected "samples" of it so they can prove what it is made out of.

So you don't even know enough to understand how scientists have learned what the sun is made of. No surprise there.

Quote by: Technosoul As the debate continues about the nature of Black Holes we might wish to take note of the following concept. SPACE.com -- The New History of Black Holes: 'Co-evolution' Dramatically Alters Dark Reputation Whatcha think about that?

I think that you don't understand what that article is saying. It isn't really all that shocking. Moreover, it has no relevance whatsoever to your fantasy.

Quote by: Technosoul Meanwhile some folks are speculating that Black Holes are Gravity Forces that result from curved space and "circular orbits" as reviewed here.... More Yadda da da

And you didn't understand that one either, did you? It isn't about any speculation about black holes being gravity forces. They have gravity because they are matter.

Quote by: Technosoul And so while you scientists go on guessing about the observations concerning black holes I will cut through all that red tape and present the right "answer".

Read the definition of pseudoscience. You aren't a scientist, don't even understand simple physics (much less astrophysics and cosmology) and yet you know the answer. You haven't even stated the question.

Quote by: Technosoul The following is a webpage that shows how "time" can be reversed (back to front - upside down) when you look at the other side of the universe through the "lens" of curved (clear) space. Which fact supports my theoretical explaination (aka - theory).

You don't have a theory since you have no observations, no hypothesis, no prediction and no testing. Your babble is meaningless and an article on optics certainly doesn't support it. It only makes you look foolish.

Quote by: Technosoul Now in organic life forms the body has two black holes, one for creating new life and one at the other end for eating food (not counting the rear one).

BWAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHA You're a troll, aren't you? Nobody could be serious about such bilge.

Quote by: Technosoul So if the Black Hole is consuming solar systems like a preditor eating food then I would ask you .... why?

Really, really bad analogy. Pure nonsense, in fact.

Quote by: Technosoul Is it because the universe must be kept in balance so that solar systems do not overpopulate the space - causing the universe to expand and get too "fat"? The whole idea sounds a litte nutty if you ask me. That a "dark force" is running around eating the "children of light" - sounds too biblical or too much like a Star Wars movie for my taste.

The idea sounds more than "a litte [sic] nutty."

Quote by: Technosoul So again I ask; Why must solar systems be eliminated by preditor Black Hole "monsters"?

Are you really not aware that your question is is pure nonsense? Anyway, what's a "preditor," black hole or otherwise?

Quote by: Technosoul According to you "dictionary of science" it would seem then that the theory of evolution, the theory of the Big Bang, and Hawkings theory of the Black Hole, all do not really meet the standards for being called a "theory", because they are still being debated and undergoing peer reviews.

Or, it would seem that you don't know what science is or how it works. It would also seem that you have a bit of a reading comprehension problem. Where would you ever get the idea that scientific theories aren't debated among scientists?