I already know about pseudoscience and have already stated that I am not a scientist and do not claim otherwise.
As a science teacher you might be aware that Steven Hawking is having a problem with his theory about the black hole consuming everything, due to the paradox as outlined at this webpage.... (see bottom of page).
A Turtle. As a former science teacher you should know a typo when you see one and be able to make the apparent correction in spelling with your brain power.
You keep saying "read a book and learn" and yadda da da, A new theory is not a repeat of fomer theories. You cannot read about a new idea in an old book. You are like those people who read the Bible and thought the earth was flat because everyone said so, you think the guy on the Mayflower is "crazy" or poorly educated. You laugh at the new idea because it would mean that all that stuff you learned is no longer right. Times they are a-changin'. Well, the earth is not flat and the universe is not flat and you will not fall off the "edge of the universe" into a Black Hole like they did in that Star Trek movie. That is if my theoretical explaination is correct once all the peer reviews and testing is completed.
Next you will be telling me that someone went out to the sun and collected "samples" of it so they can prove what it is made out of.
As the debate continues about the nature of Black Holes we might wish to take note of the following concept.
SPACE.com -- The New History of Black Holes: 'Co-evolution' Dramatically Alters Dark Reputation
Whatcha think about that?
Meanwhile some folks are speculating that Black Holes are Gravity Forces that result from curved space and "circular orbits" as reviewed here....
More Yadda da da
Orbits in Strongly Curved Spacetime
And so while you scientists go on guessing about the observations concerning black holes I will cut through all that red tape and present the right "answer".
The following is a webpage that shows how "time" can be reversed (back to front - upside down) when you look at the other side of the universe through the "lens" of curved (clear) space.
Lens (optics - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia)
Which fact supports my theoretical explaination (aka - theory).
Hawking cracks black hole paradox - 14 July 2004 - New Scientist
Now in organic life forms the body has two black holes, one for creating new life and one at the other end for eating food (not counting the rear one). So if the Black Hole is consuming solar systems like a preditor eating food then I would ask you .... why? Is it because the universe must be kept in balance so that solar systems do not overpopulate the space - causing the universe to expand and get too "fat"? The whole idea sounds a litte nutty if you ask me. That a "dark force" is running around eating the "children of light" - sounds too biblical or too much like a Star Wars movie for my taste.
So again I ask; Why must solar systems be eliminated by preditor Black Hole "monsters"?
According to you "dictionary of science" it would seem then that the theory of evolution, the theory of the Big Bang, and Hawkings theory of the Black Hole, all do not really meet the standards for being called a "theory", because they are still being debated and undergoing peer reviews.