Quote:
|
Quote by: CoffeeSaint Oh no, it was clear. But I respond to words, not intentions. |
Somehow, I guessed as much. By doing such, you accomplish naught but adding to the length of this discussion:(
Quote:
|
Quote by: CoffeeSaint For its rights to be protected, the mother's rights must be infringed, and one person's rights end where another's begin. |
So, for instance, the mother's right to privacy ends when the fetus' right to life is infringed?
Quote:
|
Quote by: CoffeeSaint Of course, at one minute before birth, the infant's potential rights should be taken into consideration, as long as the protection of the rights would not put the mother at undue risk, so an abortion at birth-minus-60-seconds should not be acceptable. And it isn't. |
And two minutes before birth? At what point to do you draw the line?
Quote:
|
Quote by: CoffeeSaint But if you want to make this shades-of-gray issue into a black and white one, there it is: infant that depends on its mother has no rights; infant that could be cared for by anyone has rights. |
Why?