[dilligras]

I think a more equitable solution, given the religious connotations tied to the word "marriage", would be to press for equity under the law using some other term and ensuring that any benefit under the law to a hetero couple is also available to a homo one, no matter what it's called.

I see no need to illogically confront an already antagonistic majority, possibly causing a whiplash reaction that can only divide our countrymen further.

Why not do what works, instead of insisting on hard headed, in-your-face confrontation?

Why promote hate, when love will do so much more?

Can selfish need for justification of one's abnormal choices outweigh a desire for cooperative change?

Why antagonize needlessly, thereby lessening the sense of community in our society?

Alas, the Gay Pride parades do not portend well in this regard.


.