Quote:
Quote by: Zinkovich  So you are for gay marraige? |
Haven't you been listening? Go back and read post #3356, then report back here to grovel, prostrate before my liberal aura.
From the post:
Quote:
I told my gay golf buddy awhile back that he should sue under exactly that provision of the Constitution, because if a man and woman can be deemed as married under common law, simply by cohabitating and declaring a spousal relationship, then it is illegal to deny that ability on the basis of gender alone. It is discriminatory to do so, by any standard not involving religious belief.
In other words, if you want to get married in a church, abide by their rules; otherwise a judge or ship's captain should be sufficient to the task.
|
Quote:
|
Wonderful! Finally, we have reached the point of agreement on the actual topic of this thread.
|
As if the goal here is to agree on anything. Besides, where's the fun in that?
Quote:
|
And as for me and my gay friends, most of our relationships are monagamous, and last up to 6 months to 3 years. While that might not seem long, most "living together" relationships I see usually end because of the barrier they reach concerning legal ownership(guess what might solve that issue!).
|
Anecdotal evidence? I have one friend who has lived with the same partner for 3 or 4 years, I think, but they have not been monogomous, so I don't think it counts for much.
But that says little about the group as a whole either, does it?
Need I remind us that one cannot logically generalize from a few specifics to reach a correct conclusion about the whole?
Apparently, I need.
Quote:
|
You'd have to be pretty stupid/ignorant/careless to make a mistake, but w/e.
|
Obviously, you do not adhere to the belief that stupidity, ignorance, and carelessness are the singular domain of man? And the overwhelming evidence throughout history to the contrary is to be completely ignored?
Is logic just another thing to pervert for agenda? Do the Darwin Awards not speak volumes?
Ludicrous on the face of it.
.