Quote:
Quote by: The Decider  You know all about "intent to deceive" without first seeing the results of a comprehensive congressional investigation. That's a neat trick. I say, investigate the whole war and see where the chips fall. Clinton may indeed look worse. So be it. Let the investigation go where it must. |
Ooooo YES!!! Maybe the lefties can get Fitzgerald to foist upon the populace yet another phoney, trumped up charge of malfeasance, investigating their hated opposition to the tune of millions of taxpayer funds, while wantonly ignoring all exculpatory evidence, even a secret confession by Armitage, in order to drag out the "investigation" (and thus media coverage and the face-time so desperately sought by lefty career beaurocrats) long enough for its media circus to affect approval numbers in the polls.
Easily manipulated by these machinations are we?
Quote:
|
Obviously you know zilch about Judith Miller's "reporting." The "lefty" gave her information FAVORABLE to Bush's case for war--the purported "aluminum tubes" for Saddam's nuclear program, mobile bio-chemical "labs," stockpiles of weapons of mass destruction--all based on White House leaks that Miller didn't bother to corroborate.
|
Excuse me? Perhaps you would be well advised to keep up with current events, instead of hanging onto your commie pinko talking points until they are so outdated that their repitition serves only to make you look the fool.
I was talking about the NYT's disclosure of NSA programs like tracking terror money and wiretapping phones of foreign enemy agents.
Get with the program, pilgrim.
But, it appears that I misspoke also, because the two reporters whose phone records are being examined are not themselves under investigation, just the persons who leaked the info to them.
As you were.
.