Quote:
|
Quote by: Castle Just wondering: How does the fact that something is claimed to be a direct transcription of God's word make it more reliable (or "divine", or whatever)? |
It's a personal preference. Certain stories speak to me in different ways. My personal evaluations lead me to believe that Moses and Jesus spoke for God and the words of God cannot be corrupted.
All the rest are, at best, speaking for someone who spoke for God. Gospels
according to someone else. The word of God can't be corrupted, but Jesus and Moses were men, and their words could be twisted.