Quote:
Quote by: Atlas  The Israeli soldiers kidnapped were never meant to be used as human shields, they're are far to valuable to the Hezbollah than Lebanese civilians, and are meant to be used as trading cards in exchange of releasing hundreds of Hezbollah terrorists from Israeli prisons, so it is assured they will do anything to ensure their safety once they have them as hostages. |
"Hezbollah terrorists from Israeli prisons" This is an extraordinary inappropriate statement in a reasoning debate. Just a few questions as this could be a thread of its own.
- How many?
- For how long?
- How many were ever in Hezbollah?
- What charges.
- What trial?
- What sentence?
- How long since the terrorist act?
Just for a start. I presume you have all this information that allows you to make such a bold statement. It cannot be without any backup, surely.
"How did the IDF know it would not kill its own kidnapped soldiers while it was killing the 1,000s of civilians if Hezbollah deliberately or inadvertently used them as
HUMAN SHIELDS?" Was the chance of killing their own kidnapped soldiers not high? Could it be they hoped/intended killing their own soldiers. You failed to answer this question. I said...now these kidnapped soldiers are a different matter.
Alive, they are a big embarrassment. It goes on and on, diverting them from the politicians from their corrupt activities. If they die in Hezbollah hands, then the embarrassment would quickly shift to Hezbollah who would then get the blame even if the IFD killer-pilots killed them. It makes sense. Well it would make sense to these devious Zionists. God, they assassinated their PM in front of the world and blamed some 'lone assassin sap', for god's sake. This 'device' would appeal to them, big time. So who had a higher value on these soldiers staying alive.
So you say ...
"so it is assured they will do anything to ensure their safety once they have them as hostages." That is a MIGHTY BIG ASSUMPTION. Do you have any reason to hold this opinion? Please enlighten me.
"
The Israeli soldiers kidnapped were never meant to be used as human shields" is another very presumptuous statement. Might I ask you to take a little more care in framing your allegations.
I crave clarity and detest sloppy wording..:) It is not you that I have in mind here.
Any comment on my "they assassinated their PM in front of the world and blamed some 'lone assassin sap', for god's sake" statement? No. TG, they didn't blame some innocent Arab. There are innocent Arabs, aren't there?:)