Thread: Global Warming
View Single Post
Old Nov 1, 2006, 09:59 am   #58 (permalink) (top)
Pooeypants
Neo Moderator
 
Pooeypants's Avatar
 
Location: England
Posts: 5,548
Quote:
Quote by: xyzer View Post
Here are a couple of other references that add to the debate in question..

U.S. Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works

ABC News: 'Schwarzenator' vs. Bush: Global Warming Debate Heats Up

If we can somehow infer certainty to this matter I haven/t seen any convincing evidence to buttress that contention?. There has been little contra evidence produced in the press which has the biggest audience. There has been no convincing proof tha human caused emissions are a major factor in the warming trend the earth has expericed since the last ice age? What Iv'e seen in the way of conclusions is usually qualified by the accompany language. Too much, "might", "could", "may" type stuff?
Do you ever read scientific papers? Do you ever go to the conclusions? What kind of language do they use? Do you often see absolutes being described?
Quote:
Quote by: xyzer View Post
The first article answere Pooeys continual cry for some scientists who disagree with the human caused theory..here they are!
No, it doesn't. I am well aware that there individuals out there who are skeptics. I asked for a respectable scientific organisation. So what have you got?


War is Peace
Freedom is Slavery
Ignorance is strength
Harness the power of Ingsoc, then you can capture someone killed the year before
Pooeypants is offline   Reply With Quote