Quote:
Quote by: xyzer I buy TRIGGERS take on the matter. As I have posted in the past! There is evidence we are in a generalwarming climate cycle right now. Has been with sub cycles ever since the last Ice Age. But there is also evidence that the earth has had a series of much warmer and cooler cycles in the past! These before the advent of heavier injections of human caused industrial emissions into the climate mix. |
Ever more the diversionist. No one has ever claimed that natural cycles don't exist or that we're not experiencing it and it's the change climate we're experiencing which cannot be explained by natural phenomena that has lead to the development of human induced Global warming model.
Quote:
Quote by: xyzer The exact degree of influence has not been clearly proved. |
Proof is not possible till you've eliminated all possible alternatives, is that possible? I'll leave that for you to answer.
Quote:
Quote by: xyzer We do have a plethoras of widely publicized conjecture by various scientists who have been injecting data into computer models and predicting climate a century or so hence. |
As Sonart has no doubt posted prior and that you seemingly ignore, all major scientific organisations recognise global warming and that human influence is detectable. Granted we do not have an exact figure on our contribution but that's why it's being hotly researched.
Quote:
Quote by: xyzer Often with alarming forecasts of doom. People like Gore profit from these studies by predicting a climate armageddon if something isn't done to prohibit human industrial activity. They don't seem to consider the economic impact of drastic cut backs of industrial enterprise and the risk that human caused emissions may not be a major contributor? They discount the importance of natural non human related climate influences and how mankind can not temper these natural cycles.. |
You seem to bring up Al Gore alot but my opinions of Global Warming have never been affected by what he said (I learnt about it in my science lesson). I think you are the forecaster of Doom if you think they changing this civilisation to a more efficient and less polluting workshop will cause economic disaster. Not to mention extremely short sighted given what is at stake.
So somehow, you think you know more about climatology than the experts who've dedicated their lives to studying it. Perhaps you should drop them a line on these other climatic influences that you've thought about, I mean they might be fresh out of ideas and you'll be the muse! Quite obviously you're more qualified on the matter than all of them put together!