View Single Post
Old Oct 18, 2006, 05:06 pm   #28 (permalink) (top)
iahag
Skeptic of Skeptics
 
Location: Bristol/Plymouth
Posts: 219
Quote:
Quote by: zauhiyq View Post
It is obvious you are in lack of comprehension when it comes to the bible. God is defined, measured, weighed and catagorized. Did you create the God concept? If not, let it be then, to the reference of all, the bible.

And it says right in the beginning, his spirit hovered over the waters or sea. Pretty small God. God is in heaven....heaven must be huge, God small. What is it again we should have problems imagining when it comes to God? How incomprehensable should he be again???
Hmm, what precisely have we measured about god? Ill let you answer that.

But onto the next fallacious statement. You say god has been weighed. The definition of weight: 'the magnitude of the force exerted on a mass by gravity'. In your statement, your implying that god is a mass of some sorts and that he experiences gravity also.

Quote:
And it says right in the beginning, his spirit hovered over the waters or sea.
I see now... So what is a spirit? Why is this 'hovering' over gods apparent creation significant? Why does he not 'hover' over land? Does he not 'hover' on over gaseous stars or planets with no liquid? 'Hover over' implies 'above something with respect to the direction of gravity, yet exempt from the force of gravity itself. Heh, you managed to contradict yourself in 2 paragraphs.

Quote:
God is in heaven....heaven must be huge
I assume by 'huge' you mean 'relatively large within the three spacial dimensions' (relative to what is up to you). And so by this statement, your implying that - god and heaven both exist within the 3 spacial dimensions -. Thus, your implying that god and heaven exists in that which we can see, interpret ... etc. Yet this is in contradiction to the modern theists view that god is in no way associated with our reality other than 'a mysterious guiding force'. I believe this is 2nd contradiction. (Hell, if the word 'other than' wasnt so damn specific the statement would contradict itself.)

Quote:
What is it again we should have problems imagining when it comes to God?

Perhaps its graphs like these.
Quote:
religion and IQ are strongly negatively correlated (-.886)
Perhaps its statements like these.

*edited by Chris the chees*

Graphic image: may cause distress

http://www.betar.co.uk/articles/pict..._jews_cart.jpg
images like these
Quote:
655,000 Iraqi war deaths
And stats like these that makes it hard to imagine the almighty fuzzbot.

But Im becoming heavily deviated in my rantings.


The more painless an exercise, the more likely you are of doing it. The more painful an exercise, the more likely you are of learning from it.

Last edited by Chris the Chees; Oct 18, 2006 at 10:08 pm. Reason: distressing images
iahag is offline   Reply With Quote