Thread: Social Security
View Single Post
Old May 1, 2004, 10:21 pm   #6 (permalink) (top)
Leopard
Propertarian
 
Leopard's Avatar
 
Posts: 568
Quote:
Originally posted by Lava,+--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Lava,)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteBegin-Write Winger,
Hey I know...lets dump this pyrimid scheme and let me invest that 15% of my income in the stock market...then I will sign a waver saying that the government is not responsible for me when I get old.  Freedom...what a concept!
So investing in a high risk scheme instead of a safe one - precisely what freedoms does that give you?

Regards, Lava![/b][/quote]

isn't the determination of 'safe' or 'high risk' a totally subjective one? so why not let people decide for themselves where to invest and how much risk they are willing to take? If social security is so 'good' why use FORCE to get people to comply?

michael


Take on the responsibility to be free
Leopard is offline   Reply With Quote