Quote:
Quote by: GHook93  My 9/11 reaction wasn't directed toward the physics it was more toward conspiracy website |
And...why do you think this is a conspiracy site, again? It cites new stories from legitimate articles, has no mention of new world orders or reptilians/fake moon landings/"fringe ideas", and also cites its claims in a noncircular manner.
I already explained to you why their mention of the 9/11 physicist does not make it a conspiracy site, in the very post you quoted.
Can you debunk any of the facts they specifically support and cite? Do you disagree that there is a physicist who made a report detailing his issues with the 9/11 collapse, and that he made the claims mentioned in the article? That is, after all, the only thinks they are representing as "fact", not the idea that 9/11 was a conspiracy is true, but that some think it is and do have "credentials".