| Do you think that we have to accept your values of animal life as a medium for the argument?
The bottom line is: Animals suffer minimally, if at all in the harvesting process, because otherwise would be against the law, and all that's left is how you value the animal's life, and what you value it as.
We don't have to accept your subjective stance just because you are currently the only one on your side.
And no, I would not covet a debate with a far leaning opponent if said opponent conveyed that it was somehow a privilege to debate with him/her. |