Quote:
Quote by: Jason  Clearly you were misinformed in sex ed. Briefs are not forms of contraception and fluids can easily permeate through cotton. |
I'm sorry...now I'm confused. First my opponent says "Briefs reduce sperm count." now he's telling us they do not. I am not sure the public can trust someone with so many mixed messages.
Also, I attended a sex-ed class, as you suggested, and described to the instructor how you believe conception is possible without genital contact. The teacher has scheduled an appointment with you to start with fundamentals of sex (Chapter 1: Debunking the Stork theory).
Quote:
|
Admittedly, there are fun-looking boxers. But by and large, boxers are able to keep the occasional onlooker from seeing just how big mini-me is. Popular designs distract the eye while looseness disguises true proportions. There's no way for the unfortunate man to hide his pig-in-a-blanket with briefs.
|
I, like most
PROUD Americans have nothing to hide. I am fairly satisfied with my proportions. Once again I am just not sure the American public can trust someone who obviously feels the need to hide their presumably small package. Are you not satisfied with what our creator gave you? Is religion not enough for you? Can America trust someone who lacks confidence and faith? Will our world image suffer from a leader with a small package that he is afraid to expose?
I value the public's trust, so I research my sources before I post them. My opponent posted a North Korean propaganda video designed to destroy the social fabric of American culture. Clearly the video means to discourage dialogue, free-speech, and the leisure we Americans have earned.
So we have an opponent who is sending mixed messages, is content with hiding things from the public, has a questionable respect for what God gave him, and believes propaganda from North Korea should define how we practice our FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS.
A vote for Jason is a vote for Hurricane Katrina and dead puppies.